Microsoft to invest Stac Judgment out-of $120 Mil

Microsoft to invest Stac Judgment out-of $120 Mil

81 Stuart J. Johnston, Microsoft Settles for Bit of Stac, Computerworld, June 27, 1994, at 30 (Microsoft paid $39.9 million for 155’o of Stac, and an additional $43 million over 43 months for a license to Stac’s data compression technology); Doug Barney, Microsoft, Stac Look after Argument; Microsoft In the end Pays Up, InfoWorld, June 27, 1994, at 14.

83 As explained in Section V.C., infra, the superficially irrational behavior of undermining the application vendors that produce programs that run on Microsoft’s operating system is logical specifically as the Microsoft has an independent economic incentive to monopolize the s.

85 Amy Cortese, Business Week, Dec. 19, 1994, supra, at 35 (HP, Compaq and other big U.S. PC makers plan to bundle Windows 95 into their machines).

86 Find Lawrence J. Microsoft: Not very Wonderful, Bay Area Computer Currents, Dec. 1, 1994, at 98, 101 (Ex. 1); Carole Patton, Computerworld, Nov. 14, 1994, supra, at 57 (Ex. 8).

88 Don Clark, Microsoft purchasing Intuit Inside Stock Treaty, Wall St. J., Oct. 14, 1994, at A3 (86% of retail store sales); Karen Epper, Application Offer Shakes Upwards Domestic Financial, Amer. Banker, Oct. 17, 1994, at 1, 25 (80-85%).

89 Michelle Flores, Asks for More details, Seattle Times, Nov. 22, 1994, at B11; Michael Schrage, Microsoft Produces 1000s of dollars; Can it Contour the treating They pink cupid?, Washington Post, Oct. 21, 1994, at B3; Brent Schlender, Fortune, Jan. 16, 1995, supra, at 36.

91 Brent Schendler, Fortune, Jan. 16, 1995, supra, at 4748; select plus, Michael I. Miller, PC Magazine, Jan. 24, 1995, supra, at 80 (Ex. 25) («Microsoft could require just a small service charge on each transaction. Or it could make money on the float — the interest in the few seconds it takes to move money from one place to another. Or both.»).

92 For example, leading industry analyst Rick Sherlund of Goldman Sachs predicted that with the settlement, Microsoft «should dominate the market for desktop software for the next 10 years.» And another leading analyst, Richard Shaffer concluded that «It]he operating system wars are over — Microsoft is the winner . Microsoft is the Standard Oil of its day.» Andrew Schulman, Microsoft’s Grip Towards the Software Tightened Because of the Antitrust Bargain, Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools, Oct. 1994, at 143 (Ex. 13).

93 See John M. Goodman, The fresh new Dos Heavyweights Wade Various other Bullet, InfoWorld, Aug. 29, 1994, at 87 (rating PC-DOS version 6.3 above MS-DOS version 6.22) and Earle Robinson, DOS-adaptation Insanity? Consolidation Managing Dos, Windows Sources, Oct. 1994, at 163 («my choice would be the IBM . . . it’s cheaper») and Yael Li-Ron, Desktop computer 2 6.3: Dos and Dos: Split up From the Beginning, PC-Computing, bra computers ship with MS-DOS).

Probe out-of Microsoft was Prolonged – Fairness Dept

94 Don Clark Laurie Hays, Microsoft’s New Revenue Projects Mark Problems, Wall St. J., Dec. 12, 1994, at B6 (Ex. 41).

96 All of these problems are discussed in Rory O’Connor, San Jose Mercury News, Nov. 13, 1994, supra, at 1A, 28A (Ex. 34).


99 Indeed, Microsoft’s operating system «lock-in» has permitted it to bring demonstrably inferior products to market (products that did not enjoy any appreciable consumer acceptance) without negative consequences to the company. See Michael Morris, Microsoft Offer: Too little, Too late, S.F. Examiner, July 24, 1994, at C-5. (Ex. 33)

one hundred Joseph Farrell, Huntsman K. Monroe and Garth Saloner, The new Vertical Providers Away from Globe and Systems Competition Versus Parts Race, Oct 1994 (operating papers).

101 Look for, elizabeth.grams., supra, note 32. (Microsoft presently holds greater than 90% of the X86 operating system market share); Christopher O’Malley, Personal Computing, October 1986, supra, at 181, 183 («Microsoft’s operating system» has «better than 95 percent» share of the X86 systems.)